Last night I went through my absentee ballot and voted for state and local candidates for this upcoming election tomorrow; and yet, to see, who I vote for President 2008? I should be posting this ad for free coffee post-vote on the Rosacea website as a “teaser”, as follows:
Either way, there is incentive to vote now, from the big leagues…
Image via Wikipedia
Tomorrow is November 4t, 2008. What is your incentive to vote? Mine had to be “reinstated” by writing a short article for Helium.com that was on the topic of ” However, Starbucks has advertised for San Francisco that all locations will offer a free coffee to persons AFTER they have voted. If you are given a receipt or some other proof of voter registration, possibly that may be needed but there was no mention of it on the advertisement online at

Related articles by Zemanta
Finally, if you want to infringe on my privacy over coffee - read my short -story, wonder if Starbucks got the idea from my little story (follows, but you can click to link as well ):
I changed my political views for my husband/boyfriend/fiance: A woman’s perspective
The
Presidential election is November 4, 2008. It seems like 2004 just
passed when I volunteered at the local election polls, counting the
insufferable dogs allowed into the polling place, and surviving the
eleven hour shift with two breaks and three plus cups of coffees,
compliments of my ex-boyfriend, Charles.
There must have been over 30 dogs voting alongside their masters
that day, more dogs than persons arriving from out of district. Time
flies and so did the umbrage at having failed a relationship somewhere
between 2005 and 2008. It was between election campaigns of
Ex-President Clinton (Democrat, 1993-2001) and President Bush
(Republican) that I became aware of the national shift from jobs and
local politics in 2004, to issues surrounding the Middle East Conflict
in a new “war election” for 2008. Jobs at home paled against the $750
billion dollar national bailout; further fueling these last weeks of
candidate debates. It appears no truce is in sight while the American
public awaits the shoes to fill after President George Walker Bush
(2001 ).
Any and all candidates’ successes aside, a boyfriend has been placed
back in the classified ads. Diversity reflects the socio-political
future of our nation that outshines any prior new course in history.
Like Sandra Day O’Conner, the first woman Supreme Court Judge, hope for
a new national relationship is edified with the Clintons’ comeback.
Only now junior Senator Hillary Clinton runs alongside her husband’s
once upon a time rival, Barack Obama. I have not lost my belief in the
stability of resolutions, even with Charles out of the picture, but
will this minority duo in government counter turn if instated in
office? Apropos is the lossless love between President Bush and his
running mate, Vice President Richard B. Cheney.
Maybe Charles is reminiscent of that relationship -who else would
equate women’s vote to the backseat that government took in the
shameful connection with the failed impeachment attempt of Ex-President
Clinton. Except maybe Charles’s statement about “jumping ship” from the
Democrats, he has only deference towards the men of the Oval Office;
this he said over Grande sized coffees and Splenda packets (his taste
not mine) from Starbucks whilst discussing life and liberty to the
pursuit of a relationship. Maybe, like President Nixon and Watergate,
the true and revealing facts would have spilled from the First Lady’s
tea-set had she been sought as a candidate for this 2008 election
without an African-American President to elect. Not to sound surely
about good deals when they are far and few between for Democrats in a
Republican dominated era.
Personally, I feel the woman’s vote is paramount when we are
guaranteed a woman in the White House. Sen. Hillary Clinton’s political
presence as the First Lady would certainly historicize her role,
already provocative and far from obscure with President Bill Clinton.
However, personally, Charles was only here for President Bush (Junior)
and so he is relegated to “Scotties” and other dog-treat conundrums of
the election rather than commentary on the nation states, and neither
do I.
The election campaign, while bringing a new class of female
candidacy, and comparatively meager pickings doubled the radical choice
of geography and social background represented by McCain’s campaign
choice for vice-president, Governor Sarah Palin. Gov. Palin (also a new
mother)reels of animosity on the personal home front. There wasn’t
enough time to delve into the do’s and don’ts for drafting Palin, it
was a short walk to the car from the library, and Charles wasn’t
interested in talking politics, but noticed my “Vote McCain” bumper
sticker. I will consider Vice Presidential hopeful Gov. Sarah Palin a
breath of fresh air and possibly the best candidate to stand behind
Presidential hopeful John McCain (R-AZ) because there is little time to
argue; better yet, Charles isn’t in the picture to dissolute any dreams
of peace in our international midst.
Unfortunately, absence does not make the heart grow fonder. It was
not “have you heard” or any other slogan for a minority president that
entertained Barack Obama prior to break-up conversations with Charles.
No, it was, “A Black for president, who’s in it?” This was his initial
reaction. The melodrama and cinematic attitude meant I should have
responded with some gender relevant quip, like “Black man you mean, and
anyone can vote.” Time and a parking meter quelled old school thoughts.
Conversations over $3.20 mocha lattes precipitated my ex-partner’s
decision to vote “absentee” the same week Wall Street fell 800 points
(another historic moment) following the House defeat the $700 billion
national bailout plan.
Talking about parking meters rather than why not to vote for a
Vietnam vet and a woman, is like listening to his rhetoric about the
minority vote versus national freedom of speech. My interest in Charles
not my decision to vote waned considerably after that. November 4th
will be what Charles liberally terms “sitting out” from party politics.
It is more interesting to talk about the humane society over the phone
with a friend than to recall his cantankerous opinions of American
politics.
Harangues at local coffeehouses with Charles are replaced by
McCain-Palin unsolicited “vote absentee” e-mails. In an afterthought,
the positive side of this election is that no one is too old, too poor
or too infirmed to run for office. No one has an arrest record or is
likely to be criticized by Hollywood for their interest in their
private affairs; and finally, all of the candidates are well off
financially. Me? I lost Charles and so in future request: Could you Mr.
President, please get a dog?